I don’t normally think of the Holy Spirit as a
bearded Scotsman with a sawn-off shotgun. I also rarely see a movie as thick with
Christianity as Skyfall.
I never went scavenging for Christ
figures in the Lord of the Rings, and it
would be wrong to say Skyfall “had Christian themes,” as if the directors had
sat down and sketched out the prepackaged problem, the gospel message, and
Bond’s conversion experience in advance. Rather, at the climax of Skyfall, I felt
that I was actually watching the drama of the Gospel unfold.
I also felt like I was crazy. Since seeing the
movie I’ve read reviews that criticize the plot and characters as unoriginal
and ask when the Bond franchise is going to wake up to its eternally unsavory
treatment of women. I’ve been more absorbed by the movie’s symbolic qualities,
but I should acknowledge those reviews because they helped me understand what
my analysis was not—and also offered a clue to the sense of bleakness that
ensued from thinking too long about certain aspects of the film.
The narrative of Skyfall is
a triumphal rejection of paganism. What it says about life and death, love and hate, sin
and judgment and redemption, is so emphatically Christian that it felt lifted
from the pages of medieval theology. You don’t have to see the movie this way,
but it doesn’t take much mental exertion to do so if you recognize the villain.
What the story did with him was bound to be important, just because of the
characteristics he possesses.
Silva is a man of the world: smooth-tongued, seductive,
brilliant, urbane. He controls a global operation of spies and intrigues, rigs
elections and ends lives with a wave and a yawn, and lives as a law unto
himself. England and the empire are jokes to him. He is the accuser, hacking
into M’s computer and conscience to tell her to “Think on your sins.” And for
all his polish, he’s demonic:
“[Even] the use of
electricity may be ‘demonic,’ as in fact may be the use of anything and of life
itself…[T]he experience of evil which we call demonic is not that of a mere absence of good, or, for that matter,
of all sorts of existential alienations or anxieties. It is indeed the presence of dark and irrational power” (Alexander Schmemmann).
It’s no coincidence that Silva
is totally dependent on force. His clockwork of computers and mind games boils
down to control. In every way, Silva matches the character of Satan in
classical and medieval theology and literature: scoffer, accuser, warlord,
gentleman—a genius only able to corrupt, not create. So what do you do with the
devil?
This is where Bond comes
in. Early in the film, he’s mired in reckless dissipation. When he comes back
from the dead and back on duty in the face of a shadowy but personal threat to
M and MI6, he is still struggling with M’s earlier betrayal and the effects of
living for himself: substance and alcohol addiction, a deterioration from his
machine-like physical condition, and a disdain for authority rooted in
“psychological issues from his childhood.” He may have skirted death, but he
hasn’t found newness of life.
Nevertheless, he begins
hunting down the threat. Eventually he meets the mastermind (Silva), who plays
with his confidence, shows off his own strength and the bizarre wreckage of an
island from which he brings his twisted fantasies to life, and even invites (then
threatens to coerce) Bond to join his side.
Bond’s response to this
situation is clever, but not morally compelling. In a distasteful sequence
involving a waste of trust and a woman’s life, Bond relies on his wits and
training to spring Silva’s trap and take him back to England. As ugly as this
moment is, it’s the point where he declares himself as Silva’s enemy. Whether
he can outsmart the villain or not, he’s picked a side.
Back in London, M and Bond
find out Silva is still playing his own very planned out game. When the
technological wiles of MI6 fail to exorcise the demon, Bond realizes their
conflict is about more than which spider has the cleverer web. The real
question is whether loyalty can withstand blind force and impersonal hatred. So
Bond changes the battle. He goes off the grid and into his past, luring Silva to
his fortress of a childhood home. Some viewers found this implausible. Fine,
but the symbolism starts to get really interesting. Here we find out that Bond
is an orphan, and M recruited him to the Secret Service from the Scottish moors.
Arriving at the mansion, Bond and M find an
unexpected companion: the old gamekeeper, Kincade. When Bond tells Kincade the
upcoming showdown “isn’t your fight,” Kincade answers, “Try and stop me, you
uppity little shit.” Out of childhood, out of the shadows, out of the past, enter
the Helper—one who has become unfamiliar but who knows the orphan as well as he
knows himself, and will care for the widowed M in her distress.
When Silva arrives, Bond is
no longer impressed with his wiles and force—he actually rolls his eyes at the
overbearing mode of Silva’s approach. M, the defender of Britain, is
defenseless. Her job is execute Bond’s plans and flee at the right moment, with
Kincade’s help, to the estate’s old chapel. Bond has taken her place as
defender. In defending M, he defends Britain; in defending both of them, he also
defends his mother. The orphan is fighting for natural affection, safety for
the widow, and kingdom against chaos. Everything Silva laughed at, Bond has owned.
This isn’t just the settling of an old score—this is about an eschatology of
chaos vs. peace.
The action sequence in the
old house is flawlessly executed and amazing. (Implausible, some complain, but
that’s the whole point of making Bond movies.) Bond neutralizes Silva’s attacks
one by one, until they are both paused, hiding behind fortresses. So with one
fuse Bond destroys both. The conflict becomes man to man.
And it centers on M. The
woman who earlier declared that “regret is unprofessional” is wounded at the
hip, shedding blood for the sins she wouldn’t acknowledge. Kincade, the Helper,
is leading her to the church, shining a light for her feet on the dark moor.
That flashlight catches Silva’s eye. Naïve Mr. Kincade, the viewer thinks with
a cringe, but the nature of light is to overcome darkness.
When Silva finds M in the
church, she’s all alone. Another failure by Kincade, you’d think. But just as
providence is not the same as redemption, Kincade’s job is to come alongside,
not ultimately to save.
Silva thinks he has
dispatched Bond, so when he finds M, all obstacles between them have fallen. In
a stunning renunciation of his quest for revenge, Silva embraces M, puts a gun
to both their heads, gives M the trigger, and begs her to “Free us both.” Suddenly
all he wants is oblivion, absorption, and dissolution into the universe. What
he’s demanding of M is an admission that her love and his hate, her sins and
his justice, her self and his self, are finally meaningless and indistinct. What
he thought for so long was hatred for her was nothing but hatred for his own
corrupt self and everything that was not corrupted like it. This renunciation
of personality, rationality, moral distinction, and being itself, is the
pinnacle of demonic paganism. Weston’s possessed and jumbled consciousness in Perelandra came vividly to my mind:
“‘You be very careful, Ransom. I’m down in the
bottom of a big black hole. No I’m not, though. I’m on Perelandra. I can’t
think very well now, but that doesn’t matter, he does all my thinking for me.
It’ll get quite easy presently. That boy keeps shutting the windows. That’s all
right, they’ve taken off my head and put someone else’s on me. I’ll soon be all
right now.’…Ransom could never make up his mind whether it was a trick or
whether a decaying psychic energy that had once been Weston were indeed
fitfully and miserably alive within the body that sat there beside him…The
intoxicated will which had been slowly poisoning the intelligence and the
affections had now at last poisoned itself and the whole psychic organism had
fallen to pieces.”
Silva’s last request is for
negation of his being—to become utterly incomprehensible.
And it is his last request. Of course Bond isn’t dead, and he shows up and
finishes Silva in the knick of time. (Interestingly, no shot is fired in the
church.) M is beyond physical help, but she’s safe from moral madness. The
apostle of Death has died. Her death isn’t a theft or an abdication, but a
passing on into the province of God’s mercy. Bond is there to mourn and Kincade
to witness when she goes.
I suppose it should be
strange that in all of this there isn’t really a Christ figure. Bond might fit
in a pinch, since he defeats death symbolically when he kills Silva and personally
when he escapes drowning twice. But he needs redemption as much as anyone. Not
until he spends himself for love of someone else does he find himself again
after his long malaise, and many of his actions in the meantime are repulsive.
If I was to stick an archetype on him, I would pick the prodigal son or maybe
the wayward apostle returning to grace. But I don’t think it’s necessary to
stick an archetype on him for the drama that plays out among Silva, M, and
Kincade to hold its Christian resonance. Bond is just a sort of spokesman.
The theme of the whole
movie is expressed in a word, in the scene where Bond is tied up in a chair on
Silva’s island. Silva has just finished showing off his machines and his global
control, prompting Bond to comment, “I suppose everyone has to have a hobby.”
“What’s yours?” asks Silva.
Bond thinks a moment. “Resurrection.”
You ended with the very best bit. The offhand, dismissive way Bond says, "I suppose everyone has to have a hobby." And then Silva tries to turn it around on him, in a typically dissipated "What makes you better than me?" kind of way. And Bond, on a dime, turns deadly earnest as he spits out the word, "Resurrection." It has the reversing effect of a joke, but flipped - whereas referring to resurrection as a "hobby" should lower its status, instead Bond (supposedly helpless) has his status elevated.
ReplyDeleteI wish very much that the filmmakers could have done more with Berenice Marlohe's character, Severine. The actor had such presence, and her role in the story seemed heavily freighted with potential meaning along exchatological lines. It was as if the writers got tired and gave up when it came to thinking through her arc.
Not to mention she was rivetingly beautiful. I think you're right to assign blame to the filmmakers. The way Bond trashed her was out of sync with the rest of the movie, and it left a very bleak stamp on the whole.
Delete